Site icon Executive Compass

The Differences Between Social Value and Added Value in Tendering

Some clients occasionally conflate or confuse social value and added value when bidding for public sector contracts. We explain their differences, ideas for both topics and how best to respond to them within the tender question set.

Simply put, social value refers to a positive change your organisation will bring to the local community as a result of contract award or a place on the framework agreement. The benefits of social value are typically outside the contractual scope of works and are organised into three main groups – social, environmental and economic benefits. The buyer may choose to employ a general rubric, such as the Social Value Portal’s National TOMs calculator or central government’s MAC table, to guide bidders towards their preferred outcomes.

In contrast, added value is defined as any efficiencies, cost savings or improvements to service delivery which can be provided within the contract scope. Quality questions around added value will generally be more ‘open-ended’ than social value questions, placing the burden on bidders to rely on their own ideas and innovation to score points with the evaluators.

Integrating added value into your service model

Added value within a tender can be a standalone quality question or just one element of a quality response, where the buyer expects you to outline what innovations you can bring to the contract. Examples include:

Both ‘soft’ and ‘hard’ cost savings can be ideas which bring added value into your service provision. However, it is crucial to emphasise to evaluators that soft offerings, such as the first two examples, also add value by improving the overall quality of the service. Clearly labelling soft added value offerings will ensure you receive the deserved marks from the evaluation committee.

Potential social value offerings and initiatives

Although preferred social value outcomes can occasionally be prescriptive, the contracting authority may also decide to give minimal guidance in the wording of a question. In these instances, it is advisable to organise your response around common themes, as below:

Remember, all social value commitments must be tangible, relevant and proportionate to the overall value of the contract. Minimal, vague or irrelevant commitments will result in reduced marks from authorities. In many instances, such as tenders with local councils or housing associations, social value will comprise 20% of the evaluation criteria. Equally, buyers will not expect exorbitant commitments, such as hiring ten new members of staff, for a low-value contract.

Differences between social value and added value in practice

The inherent differences between social value and added value will extend not just to the tender process but into service delivery. The examples below demonstrate how you will need to be mindful of these differences when delivering works or services over the contract term.

Our team of bid and tender writers are highly experienced in responding to both added value and social value questions in tendering. Furthermore, all tenders including a social value element benefit from our in-house, dedicated Social Value Practice division, where your assigned writer can liaise and access appropriate expertise.

If you would like to find out more about the bid and tender services we can provide to your organisation or have a free, no-obligation discussion around a live project, our sales and marketing team are contactable at 0800 612 5563 or via email info@executivecompass.co.uk.

Exit mobile version